Archive for February 9th, 2011
Smoke-filled Rooms, Antisemitism and The Greens.
Years back students of history or politics will remember how the term, smoke-filled rooms was coined.
It meant how political decision-making was conducted behind closed doors, where Joe (or Josephine) Public were excluded, whilst political wheelers and dealers decided things.
It is something that newer political parties try to argue that they are against.
They try to argue that they represent a new form of politics, more transparent, more open, involving people, ordinary people, not just politicos in (non-smoke-filled) rooms deciding what is what, or as one political leader put it:
“[We have] promoted a new style of politics emphasising transparency,accountability and consensual ways of working…”
That’s what such parties would have you believe, but the reality is more prosaic. This is ably illustrated by the Green Party’s discussions on antisemitism.
Within the past few weeks a Green Party decision-making committee has decided that there should be no Green Party policy on antisemitism.
That is despite a Green Party conference decision to implement one.
A policy paper was even drawn up, it was not perfect, but a good start and it at least showed that the Green Party was serious about antisemitism.
Then, it was withdrawn for “corrections”, or some such nonsense.
Whilst in the background those opposed, to any firm Green party policy on antisemitism, worked their manoeuvres emulating those smoke-filled rooms of old.
Low and behold in January 2011, when the topic came up again it was decided to shelve any concrete policy on antisemitism by the Greens.
Which I suppose shows that politics rarely ever changes, in spite of all the fine words.
It also means that the Greens will have to work very hard to convince non-members that they are serious about anti-racism and their opposition to antisemitism.
We’ve been here before. Hugh Muir was right first time out.
Update 1: The issue of antisemitism has some history in and around the Green party so it’s helpful to remember some of the previous posts:
The Green Party and antisemitism – Eve Garrard
Isca Stieglitz: Green Party and anti-semitism?
On the connection between anti-Israel sentiment and antisemitism
Update 2: Not all Greens are happy with this situation, as one points out at the Daily (Maybe):
“We now have a situation where GPRC have officially accepted that there is a problem but have resolved to do absolutely eff all about it.”
Continuing Coverage: Wikileaks And Assange.
Some new material has been released into the public domain concerning the allegations against Julian Assange.
I can’t make my mind up on it. I think it tends to detract from the issues which have come out during these Wikileaks, Techworld reports:
“Text messages sent by the two women who accuse WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange of rape and assault mention “revenge” and “economic gain,” according to testimony during the second day of his extradition hearing.
Defense witness Björn Hurtig said he was allowed under police supervision to examine hundreds of messages, which “suggest things that go against what the claimants have said regarding the rape.”
Hurtig, who is Assange’s attorney in Sweden, said he saw text messages “speaking of revenge” and taking “economic advantage” of Assange, who is wanted for questioning related to alleged incidents with two women in mid-August 2010.
He faces possible charges of unlawful coercion, sexual molestation and rape, but his legal team presents those accusations as a veiled attack related to WikiLeaks’ release of secret U.S. diplomatic cables.”
His solicitors, Finers Stephens Innocent, have other material on their site here.
I haven’t looked through it if anyone finds anything good then please let me know.
And some of my other posts on the matter:
Julian Assange: Fool? Historically illiterate ? Or Worse?
Julian Assange And The English Middle Class.
Shamir, Stupidity And Julian Assange.
